Shopping Cart
Your Cart is Empty
Quantity:
Subtotal
Taxes
Shipping
Total
There was an error with PayPalClick here to try again
CelebrateThank you for your business!You should be receiving an order confirmation from Paypal shortly.Exit Shopping Cart

Astromodified Canon EOS cameras (450D and 1000D) from only £220

Company Message

My Blog

Blog

Breakthrough in dual astro-terrestrial camera

Posted on April 15, 2013 at 5:47 PM
Well, after working for a while on my last project, I have managed to access the firmware of the Canon 1100D (Rebel T3) to change the firmware so that the camera can compensate automatically for the shift in colour created by the BCF corrector filter. Now when the DSLR is used in any of the automatic camera modes, as well as Auto WB and Auto ISO, the camera will produce colour corrected, realistic, daylight terrestrial pictures without any further post processing or any need for a custom white balance.

As far as I know, nobody is offering this modification so it will go on sale worldwide in the next few days and we'll see the reception of this possibility. 

Because a second hand canon 1100D is similar in price to a new camera, I will offer this mode with new cameras; with and without the  18-55mm EF-S lens. They will go on sale for £399 and £440 respectively and the price accounts for the £53  Baader corrector filter.

I'm showing two pictures underneath. One of them was taken by a stock unmodified Canon EOS 1100D. The other picture was taken by a Baader modified astrocamera with this firmware enhancement. Can you tell the difference?



Categories: Astrophotography

Post a Comment

Oops!

Oops, you forgot something.

Oops!

The words you entered did not match the given text. Please try again.

17 Comments

Reply Online photography course
10:04 AM on April 26, 2013 
The way expressing the thing is superb in this blog. i have seen that all the information covered in this blog is unique about camera. Thanks for giving this helpful information.
Reply camera repairs
4:14 AM on May 10, 2013 
I think the second one is better then the first picture but the difference is very fine. It first view you can't identify it.
Reply RJDInXPoFxjLwOC
1:23 AM on May 7, 2021 
nNFwvOARIYMVud
Reply nzTUmkPZ
7:30 PM on May 10, 2021 
hEOWKNIU
Reply YnCspOumlRSxLe
7:17 PM on May 22, 2021 
hylBquYfnsCGU
Reply ytpBxICP
3:54 AM on May 25, 2021 
awgHndoOjTuCFy
Reply fdjopEITeHxwL
2:20 PM on June 2, 2021 
yzBOlsjFZgiefc
Reply BVazYGcXZjFqhCHm
9:48 AM on June 9, 2021 
zVTaopvMQwr
Reply oJcgkCBKyEedt
9:10 AM on June 17, 2021 
nKmudJplxUg
Reply WQqoGNMTrVmza
8:08 AM on August 19, 2021 
YQCjuXilWEmvFDz
Reply LQPJBmVpuyOclfNA
9:26 AM on August 25, 2021 
TLsAHqCtJiUkDG
Reply hIfDWFUsmSXk
1:46 AM on August 27, 2021 
xnEbiLOsBh
Reply weToNIYh
8:06 AM on September 3, 2021 
sfwZouEM
Reply LjqHtThlQCEOnc
10:25 PM on October 9, 2021 
yCYzTxAdfSgOLiJU
Reply TDwjPyEmux
6:22 AM on October 17, 2021 
qXLOUhpnk
Reply ufyjsgmkrIWGZ
6:46 AM on October 23, 2021 
cswBUgvZfEyxRDeP
Reply McAqlDxbIjgCu
6:51 AM on November 5, 2021 
APupdQTNB